RSS Feed
Feb 21
Comments Off

Bank of Ireland believes it has turned corner as deposits climb

Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 in Business

Dublin: Bank of Ireland said it was attracting deposits, cutting costs and expected home loan arrears to peak this year, raising hopes Ireland’s biggest lender had turned a corner after a 60 per cent drop in underlying profit in 2011.

The only Irish bank to avoid nationalisation after an unprecedented property crash, the bank said yesterday low interest rates would make it harder to achieve its goal for a net interest margin — the gap between what it charges for loans and what it pays to borrow — of 2 per cent in 2014.

But Chief Executive Richie Boucher was optimistic of progress after the cost of drawing in deposits and an expensive government guarantee of its liabilities trimmed the margin by 13 percentage points to 1.33 per cent in 2011 ref.

Cost base

Article continues below

© 2011 Gulf News (www.gulfnews.com)
Feb 20
Comments Off

Can policy makers in Beijing control China’s decent?

Posted on Monday, February 20, 2012 in Business

Recent data out of China has increased concerns the government may not move to loosen monetarily policy, thereby limiting its ability to simulate growth. Given that China is such a large source of demand throughout the world, any hint that Beijing may experience a hard landing has major implications for economic markets.

By chris Tedder, Research Analyst Forex.com

Inflation data started the rumours about the PBoC, with January’s rise of 4.5%y/y in consumer prices representing the first time the headline figure has increased over the previous month since July last year, when inflation was around 6.5%y/y. If this figure does deter policymakers from further loosening, it could limit Chinese growth prospects and in turn increase the chance of a hard landing for the world’s second largest economy.

However, we do suspect that these figures have caused Beijing to reconsider its position. Firstly, the Chinese lunar New Year has historically caused volatility in the following month’s CPI data and on most occasions led to temporary spike. Thus, once we take out the holiday impact out of equation, inflation may still be declining. But the market will have to wait until February’s figure for confirmation that CPI inflation is resuming its moderating trend. Nevertheless, we are predicting the headline figure to fall to 3.5-4% after the effects of the New Year have eroded.

The same distortion can be seen in recent trade figures out of China. China’s trade surplus increased to $27.3bn in January, led by a massive decline in imports of 15.3%y/y. Whilst some of the decline in imports can be attributed to scores of manufactures shutting down production during the New Year holiday, it is the second month of consecutive declines. This paints a worrying picture of the domestic demand situation in China and may point to harder slowdown than economists predicted.

Furthermore, Chinese exporters have been hit hard by weak levels of demand from its largest trading partner, Europe. Export growth has been on a gradual decline since September last year, representing a slump from +24.5 to -0.5. Given the predicted levels of growth in Europe over next few years China’s export sector may continue to suffer and accordingly China may have to find demand in other markets. Yet, right there is no viable alternative that can fully account for the pre-European financial crisis levels of growth.

What does this mean for monetary policy? We maintain our view that the PBoC will have a relatively prudent stance involving selective easing. The PBoC’s reluctance to cut the required reserve ratio (RRR), combined with improving global conditions and domestic growth that is moderating within targeted levels, support over view of discerning policy loosening. Nevertheless, we are still predicting RRR cuts and more growth stabilising measures by Beijing to help control the descent in the country’s GDP growth and in turn avoid a hard landing.

Overall, Beijing still has a lot of room to move in regards to policy and stimulating growth, thus we expect that China will avoid a hard landing. However, a continued slowdown in China will have impacts for commodity demand and corresponding raw material based economies. Furthermore, overall risk sentiment should remain fairly jittery to news stemming from the second largest economy in the world.

© 2011 AMEINFO (www.ameinfo.com)
Feb 19
Comments Off

$6tr of fake US bonds seized in mafia probe

Posted on Sunday, February 19, 2012 in Business

Rome: Italian anti-mafia prosecutors said they seized a record $6 trillion (Dh22 trillion) of allegedly fake US Treasury bonds, an amount that’s almost half of the US’s public debt.

The bonds were found hidden in makeshift compartments of three safety deposit boxes in Zurich, the prosecutors from the southern city of Potenza said in an emailed statement. The Italian authorities arrested eight people in connection with the probe, dubbed "Operation Vulcanica," the prosecutors said.

The US embassy in Rome has examined the securities dated 1934, which had a nominal value of $1 billion apiece, they said in the statement. Officials for the embassy didn’t have an immediate comment.

The financial fraud uncovered by the Italian prosecutors in Potenza includes two cheques issued through HSBC Holdings Plc in London for £205,000, cheques that weren’t backed by available funds, the prosecutors said. As part of the probe, fake bonds for $2 billion were also seized in Rome. The individuals involved were planning to buy plutonium from Nigerian sources, according to phone conversations monitored by the police.

Article continues below

© 2011 Gulf News (www.gulfnews.com)
Feb 18
Comments Off

A Low-Cost Choice for Muni Income

Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2012 in Business

Municipal bonds may not repeat their stellar performance of 2011, but they still make sense in individuals’ portfolios, say financial advisers.

These bonds, which are exempt from federal income taxes, were among the best-performing investments last year. The average intermediate-term municipal-bond fund gained 9%, according to Morningstar Inc.

Investors have piled into these funds in recent months, partly because previous fears of widespread defaults on municipal bonds didn’t come to pass. Despite the run-up in prices, yields on municipal bonds remain higher than on some other bonds, such as U.S. Treasurys.

One popular option to benefit from this is the Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt fund, which currently yields about 1.9%.

At $32.5 billion in assets, the Vanguard fund is the largest in its category. It holds roughly 3,000 high-quality bonds around the U.S. with an average maturity of about 5.5 years.

It is also one of the least expensive funds in the category, with an expense ratio of 0.2%. Cost “is especially important when investing in bonds in a low-rate environment,” says Larry Katz, director of research at Seattle investment-advisory firm Merriman Inc. Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt returned 9.6% in 2011 and 2.2% in the month of January, according to Morningstar.

For clients who have a moderate risk appetite and who are building a portfolio in their taxable brokerage accounts, Mr. Katz allocates 18% to the Vanguard fund.

Mr. Katz believes that fears of default by states and municipalities have been overblown. “To fix their financial difficulties, municipalities can and did increase taxes, decrease services, offer new employees different pension plans and think about renegotiating old pension plans,” he says.

—Shefali Anand

Ms. Anand is a personal-finance columnist for The Wall Street Journal, based in New Delhi. Email: shefali.anand@wsj.com.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 18
Comments Off

What The Health Care Law Will Mean for Your Small Business

Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2012 in Business

As a small-business owner, you may find your head spinning when trying to figure out what the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may bring.

How the new provisions impact you, if at all, depends on the outcome of a high-profile Supreme Court case and potentially on the results of the 2012 election.

[sbhealth]

Getty Images

The law’s key provisions are set to take effect roughly two years from now, on January 1, 2014. Here’s a look at how you may be affected:

Q. What if I am a one-person business?

A. The impact for sole-proprietors and others with no employees will be much like the impact on individuals.

For people in this group, the crux of the 2014 roll-out is the individual mandate, which requires all U.S. citizens and legal residents to have health coverage or pay a penalty.

You, as a one-person business, would buy insurance through your state’s benefits exchange that will roll out in 2014.

There are some exemptions, however, such as those from certain religious backgrounds and those who are eligible for the so-called “hardship exemption” if the cost of the annual premium exceeds 8% of household income.

There are penalties intended to ensure compliance. The top penalty for individuals, once fully phased in, for not having insurance is $695 or 2.5% of income – whichever is greater.

Q. I have employees or may be hiring. What provisions impact me?

A. If you have employees, the health-care provisions are a bit more complicated.

Let’s start with what’s on the table under the law today. Since last year, firms with fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees have been eligible for a tax break if you cover at least half the cost of health insurance. (Full-time equivalent is the number of employees on full-time schedules plus the number of employees on part-time schedules, converted to a full-time basis.)

But only if you have fewer than 10 full-time equivalent employees and average salaries of $25,000 or less is your firm eligible for the full credit. Today, that full credit is 35% of your contribution toward an employee’s insurance premium. As your firm size and average wage amount goes up, the tax credit goes down. And once your business hits 25 full-time equivalent employees or $50,000 in average salaries, the credit is completely phased out. The Internal Revenue Service has full details here.

Q. What happens to the tax credits going forward?

A. In 2014, the state-based Small Business Health Options Program Exchanges will be open to small firms. And getting insurance through those exchanges could bump the maximum tax credit to 50% of your contribution, up from the current 35%.

But the tax credits won’t last. The credit is only available for a maximum of five years and only two years once the exchanges are up and running.


Q. Will I have to provide health insurance to my employees in 2014?

A. No firm is mandated to provide insurance, but in 2014, only the smallest businesses will be exempt from penalties if they don’t.

Q. What are the penalties and under what circumstances would I be exempt?

A. Once your firm reaches 50 full-time equivalent employees, a penalty will kick in if you fail to provide coverage for employees who average 30 or more hours a week in a given month. The penalty is $2,000 for each full-time employee in excess of 30 full-time employees. There are no penalties if part-time employees are not offered coverage.

A key factor in calculating the penalty is that the equation isn’t based on full-time equivalents, but rather on actual full-time employees. That means some businesses that are subject to the penalty may end up owing nothing.

Here’s a basic example: Say your firm has 25 full-time employees and 50 half-time employees that, combined, equal 25 full-time equivalents. Your firm, in effect, has 50 full-time equivalents and would be subject to the penalty if you don’t provide health-care coverage. However, your penalty cost likely would be zero because the $2,000 tally starts at the 31st full-time employee and you only have 25 full-time employees.

Q. What should I know about getting insurance for my employees?

A. You can’t just buy any old insurance to avoid the penalty. You have to provide so-called “minimum essential” and “affordable” coverage. Minimum essential coverage means covering 60% of the actuarial value of the cost of the benefits. And affordable means the premium for the coverage of the individual employee cannot exceed 9.5% of the employee’s household income.

If the coverage you offer is unaffordable, qualifying employees can get subsidized coverage through the tax credit on the state exchanges. In such a case, you will have to pay the lesser of $3,000 per subsidized full-time employee, or the $2,000-per-employee penalty after the first 30 full-time employees.

Source: WSJ Research

Write to Emily Maltby at emily.maltby@wsj.com

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 15
Comments Off

Summit opens on kingdom’s insurance boom

Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 in Business

Huge growth potential seen in Saudi Arabia’s newly liberalised market.

Saudi Arabia’s newly liberalised insurance market comes under the spotlight this week with estimates that a market currently worth around $1.5 billion annually could soar to $8 billion within 10 years.

An elite speaker faculty of key international and regional professionals will be taking part in the 2nd Saudi Insurance Summit at the Jeddah Hilton Hotel 29-30 October 2007. The Summit, taking place with the approval of the Governor of Jeddah Prince Mishaal bin Majed bin Abdulaziz, is expected to be attended by more than 300 insurance professionals, regulators and key industry players.

The Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency recently reported the insurance market grew 35% in 2006 alone. Gross premiums rose to $1.8 billion from $1.3 billion in 2005. General insurance premiums, which represented 65% of the insurance market, increased by 25% to $1.2 billion in 2006 compared with $959 million in the previous year.

Protection and savings insurance premiums, which represented a mere 3% of the insurance market, went up by almost 16% to $59 million in 2006 compared with $51 million in 2005.

But it is health insurance that is attracting the most attention – representing 32% of the insurance market – and saw premiums increased by 57% to $589 million in 2006 compared with $375 million in 2005. This growth is mainly driven by the decision to make health insurance mandatory for all expatriate workers as well as favourable economic conditions.

New laws require the kingdom’s seven million expatriates to prove that health insurance cover is provided to them by their employers. The first phase demanded compliance from companies with over 500 employees by July this year. Remaining companies have until March 2008 to ensure their workers are covered.

The opening up of Saudi Arabia’s insurance sectors has injected hundreds of millions of dollars into the market with more to come through new company licensing and public offerings.

All insurance companies operating in the Saudi market must obtain a license by March 2008 or cease operations. The capital requirements for gaining a license are $26.67 million for insurers and $53.33 million for reinsurers with an additional 10% statutory deposit. Companies are also obliged to float at least 25% of their shares on the Tadawul and meet other regulatory requirements before receiving a licence.

At present, 18 companies have been licensed, with 24 more expecting to be granted approval.

“The new laws have led many in the industry to forecast excellent growth in the non-life sector in Saudi Arabia with predictions of $4 billion growth by 2009 being touted,” said Deep Marwaha, Senior Conference Manager, of IIR Middle East, organisers of the 2nd Saudi Insurance Summit

“Within this high growth market, the landscape is shifting dramatically,” said Marwaha. “The 2nd Saudi Insurance Summit aims to ensure that key players keep abreast of new developments in what is a breakneck business environment.”

In addition to the two-day Summit, there are two practical workshops. The first is on the principles of Islamic insurance – Takaful structures and Shari’ah compliance, conducted by Rodney Wilson, Director of Postgraduate Studies and Professor of Economics at the University of Durham’s School of Government and International Affairs, UK.

A post Summit workshop – Mind the Gap! How Can We Bridge the Insurance Skill Shortage? – will be led by Ian Wilson, Head of Insurance Programmes at the Institute of Banking, Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency.

Among more than 30 leading international and regional speakers taking part in the Summit will be Dr Muhammad Al Jasser, Vice Governor of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency; Ali Al Subaihin, CEO of the Company for Co-operative Insurance (NCCI); Brad Bourland, Chief Economist of Jadwa Investment Company, Saudi Arabia; Tal Hisham Nazer, Managing Director BUPA Middle East; and Dawood Taylor, Group Head, Takaful Ta’awuni, Bank Aljazira, Saudi Arabia.

NCCI are diamond sponsors of the Summit; Medgulf and Bank Aljazira are platinum sponsors; Takaful Re is a gold sponsor; and Salama Co-operative Insurance Company and HiQSys Saudi are silver sponsors.

© 2011 AMEINFO (www.ameinfo.com)
Feb 15
Comments Off

Analysts say emerging markets rally is no bubble

Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 in Business


Wed Feb 1, 2012 8:18am EST

<span class="articleLocation”>(Reuters) – If you were burned by emerging market stocks last year, you might want to give the relationship another chance in 2012. The stocks are doing pretty well so far this year, and analysts point to multiple reasons the gains should continue.

During the first four weeks of the year, Vanguard’s MSCI Emerging Markets, the largest emerging market stock index ETF, was up nearly 11.6 percent – more than double the 5 percent return for the SPDR S&P 500.

The upswing indicates to investing experts that a drop of almost 20 percent in emerging market stocks last year wasn’t a bubble bursting.

“After burning investors last year, we expect the BRIC countries to be among the top-performing markets in 2012,” said Ned Davis Research analyst Anthony Welch of the four dominant emerging markets: Brazil, Russia, India and China. “We think this is a good time to add to exposure to those markets.”

The stocks and the funds that invest in them are still vulnerable to many of the same shocks that rumbled through the markets in 2011; but analysts say a combination of positive economic trends, comparatively strong growth, and down-to-earth prices make the recent upswing not just a recovery bounce, but an opportunity.

To support his optimistic outlook, Welch, in a January client report, pointed to a demonstrated ability of those countries to manage the delicate balance between controlling inflation and maintaining economic growth. He also pointed to signs of stabilization among global economies.

‘GOOD SHOT’ AT OUTPERFORMING U.S. STOCKS

Another draw for investors: stock prices are trading at a discount compared to historical levels even after the recent rally, said David Semple, Director of International Equity at Van Eck Global.

According to Semple’s estimates, the group is selling at less than 10 times forward earnings, compared to their historical range of 12 to 13 times earnings.

“That’s not as cheap as the post-crisis periods of late 2008 and early 2009, but it’s quite attractive,” he said.

But he also cautioned that a worsening of the European debt crisis or other developments could throw at least a temporary wrench into the picture.

“Emerging market stocks have a good shot at outperforming U.S. stocks this year, but that could easily change if the Europe situation turns into an ugly mess. And other potential problems — such as an unanticipated slowdown in developed market growth, too much credit restriction in China, and even weather-related issues that could impact food prices — are still there,” he said.

Investors are also keeping an eye on slower economic growth in the more mature emerging market countries, especially China. This year, the World Bank expects gross domestic product growth in that country to come in at 8.4 percent compared to 9.2 percent last year and 10.3 percent in 2010.

Still, GDP growth in emerging market countries is likely to continue to outpace expansion in the United States and Europe by a healthy margin, according to the most recent projections from the Conference Board, a New York-based business and economics research group funded by major corporations.

The Conference Board said it expects growth in developed economies to slow down from 1.6 percent in 2011 to 1.3 percent in 2012 while emerging market growth will decelerate from 6.4 percent in 2011 to 5.1 percent this year.

EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES

The positive impact that comparatively robust emerging market economies could have on those countries’ stocks is the main reason Weyman Gong, chief investment strategist at Signature Financial Management in Norfolk, Va., allocates as much as 20 percent of his clients’ stock portfolios to exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and mutual funds that focus on

those regions.

For broad exposure to emerging markets he uses two ETFs, Vanguard MSCI Emerging Markets and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets. As of Friday, they were up 11.57 percent and 11.65 percent, respectively, so far this year.

“In the U.S. and Europe, consumers are so highly leveraged that they have to use money to pay off debt rather than spend,” said Gong, whose firm manages some $2 billion in assets for high-net-worth individuals and families. “Emerging market households aren’t nearly as consumed by debt, so they have more money to feed the growth engine.”

Even with the group’s notoriously sharp downturns and snap-backs, Gong believes that retirees should have an allocation toward emerging market stocks in the low teens.

“Treasury bonds may seem safe, but at current yields they provide no protection from inflation,” he said. “Putting money under the mattress won’t protect you 20 or 30 years down the road.”

Mark Martiak, vice president at Premiere Financial Advisors in New York, New York, typically invests between 10 percent

and 20 percent of his clients’ equity portfolios

in emerging market securities. Because they don’t perform in sync with other asset classes such as U.S. stocks and bonds, he sees them as a good way to diversify.

“Emerging markets will remain the fuel for world growth, and secular themes such as population growth and an emerging middle class are truly powerful drivers,” he said. “But I always warn my clients that the short-term headline risk with these securities is very real.”

(Reporting By Marla Brill; Editing by Beth Gladstone, Chelsea Emery and Andrea Evans)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)
Feb 15
Comments Off

Tax-Wise Funds vs. ETFs

Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 in Business

About five years ago, George Papadopoulos shifted his clients’ assets out of tax-managed mutual funds and into exchange-traded funds.

A certified financial planner in Novi, Mich., he says the move made good financial sense and pleased his clients. “ETFs’ inherent tax advantages and lower costs resonate more with clients,” he says.

Mr. Papadopoulos isn’t the only financial adviser to make the shift. Others question whether it still makes sense in the ETF era to pay for tax-managed funds, which are run with an eye to limiting investors’ tax bills. Tax-managed funds, like other types of actively managed funds, may or may not beat market benchmarks. Indexed ETFs, meanwhile, are often cheaper and more tax-efficient and have greater transparency.

“Competition from ETFs will slay all tax-managed funds,” predicts Daniel Wiener, a New York-based money manager and editor of the newsletter the Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors.

Joel Dickson, a Vanguard Group principal and senior investment strategist, counters that Vanguard’s tax-managed mutual funds have been just as tax-efficient, if not more so, than its index funds and ETFs. Mr. Dickson says the tax-managed funds are passively managed, in that they follow an index. But they make some tax-related moves, like selling positions that have declined in value to realize a loss for tax purposes, or structuring the equity portfolio to tilt slightly away from higher-dividend securities in the benchmark.

Tax-managed funds typically aim to limit distributions of income and capital gains. Investors in the funds thus will owe little or no tax until they sell their fund shares. In addition to selling losing positions to offset gains and avoiding high-dividend stocks, a fund manager might hold stocks for more than a year (because long-term gains are taxed at lower rates than short-term gains).

When the bull market hit its peak around 1999, tax-managed mutual funds saw huge inflows as investors looked to save on taxes after racking up stock-market gains. The funds took in about $9.9 billion of new cash from investors that year, a figure that hasn’t been matched since, according to Strategic Insight Simfund.

But for most of the decade that followed, offsetting taxes wasn’t the biggest priority for some investors who already had plenty of losses embedded in their portfolios. Total assets in tax-managed funds decreased to $77.1 billion as of Oct. 30, down from $80.1 billion in 2010, Strategic Insight Simfund says. Investors withdrew a net $1.9 billion from tax-managed funds in 2010 and invested roughly $700 million this year as of Oct 30.

Active Route

For investors who want active and tax management, tax-managed mutual funds may make sense. But when fund managers don’t outperform the market or do worse than the market partly because they’re somewhat restricted by concerns about taxes, some in the industry question the value of these funds.

[TAXillo]

Jason Schneider

So far this year, some of the tax-managed funds in Morningstar Inc.’s large-blend category are trailing the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index. However, over three-year and five-year periods, the funds have held their own against that S&P 500 benchmark.

“Tax management means trying to achieve something that’s not necessarily ingrained in a mutual fund and may not be the best use of active management,” says Veerendra Virkar, an analyst at Strategic Insight Simfund.

In a traditional mutual fund, investors buy and redeem shares from the fund, and the fund periodically distributes capital gains realized when securities are sold from the portfolio. Investors may end up paying taxes on gains the fund made even before they were shareholders (although those payments reduce the tax an investor will owe when he or she eventually sells the fund shares).

In contrast, ETFs have a special legal structure which typically gives shareholders fewer capital-gains distributions than traditional mutual funds. While ETFs don’t allow investors to avoid capital gains, they enable investors to delay them until they sell the ETF.

On the Lookout

The greater certainty and control that ETFs give investors in estimating their tax bill is a reason some advisers are choosing ETFs over tax-managed mutual funds and some other types of mutual funds. “We just won’t allow our clients to be surprised by a capital gain in a year where values have depreciated,” says Carl Amos Johnson, a Peterborough, N.H., certified financial planner.

[TAX]

In an era of increased volatility where 500-plus-point swings in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are becoming more common, investors like the ability to sell their ETFs during the trading day and immediately know their transaction price. Since most ETFs are index funds, investors also like having a clearer picture of what their ETFs own instead of the approximate allocation they often get when investing in a traditional mutual fund. The passive nature of many ETFs often means lower fees for investors as well.

To be sure, not all ETFs are tax-efficient. ETFs that invest in taxable bonds throw off lots of taxable interest income, just like bond mutual funds, for instance. And investors can be surprised by the taxes they owe on precious-metals and commodity-futures portfolios. The commission that brokerages charge to buy and sell ETFs can also eat into returns over time for investors who frequently trade.

Preserving Losses

Tax-managed mutual funds allow managers to capture losses during a down market and carry those losses forward into a bull market—something most ETFs don’t do.

Major players in the tax-managed mutual-fund sector say there will likely always be a place for these funds. The stock market could see another extended bull market. And federal, state and local budget crises will probably lead to higher taxes. That’s likely to fuel greater interest in tax-conscious investing, including tax-managed mutual funds, says Duncan Richardson, chief equity investment officer for Eaton Vance Corp.

No matter what vehicle investors choose, most in the industry agree taxes shouldn’t be the leading factor in any investment decision. However, it’s still an important consideration for many investors.

“Performance after Uncle Sam is done with you can make a big difference in your wealth accumulation over time,” says Tom Roseen, head of research services at Lipper.

Ms. Dagher is a reporter for Dow Jones Newswires in New York. Email her at veronica.dagher@dowjones.com.

© 2011 Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com)
Feb 14
Comments Off

China Confiscates iPads Over Trademark Argument

Posted on Tuesday, February 14, 2012 in Business

Story By: by Eyder Peralta

A man with an Apple iPad in 2010.

Chinese authorities are pulling iPads from store shelves after a Chinese company complained that it owns the name “iPad.” According to The Wall Street Journal, the action comes after Proview (Shenzhen), a Chinese affiliate of Hong Kong manufacturer Proview International Holdings Ltd., filed for an injunction against Apple.

The Journal adds that Proview (Shenzhen) registered the name “iPad” in 2001. The paper adds:

“It’s not clear whether the Shijiazhuang case heralds a wider crackdown on iPads in China, where Apple devices generate enough demand to spark the occasional violence in front of the Californian company’s official retail stores. Proview has registered a complaint against Apple with the Beijing branch of the AIC, according to the state-run Xinhua news agency, though so far the Beijing AIC appears not to have taken action.

“In any case, the revelation that authorities in Shijiazhuang had begun confiscating iPads did not appear go over well with Apple fans on popular Twitter-like microblogging site Sina Weibo, where the news was greeted with more than a few animated thumbs-down icons.”

Mashable reports that Proview and Apple had actually come to agreement in 2010. Apple bought rights from Proview, “but rights have not extended to China.”

The Los Angeles Times reports that Proview has been taking action on a city-by-city basis.

“You’ll likely see more and more actions across the country,” Xie Xianghui, a lawyer for Proview Technology, told the Times. “Apple did not follow Chinese law, so we’re confident the authorities will side with us.”

Reuters reports that aside from filing for injunctions, Proview is also seeking $1.5 billion in compensation from Apple, because it says it has infringed on its copyright.

Feb 14
Comments Off

Prepaid cards gouge you to access your own money

Posted on Tuesday, February 14, 2012 in Business


Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:36pm EST

<span class="articleLocation”>(Reuters) – Why should you pay to spend your own money? The newest generation of prepaid debit cards, which banks keep offering despite the growing chorus of advice to the unbanked against buying into them, often levy more fees than conventional credit cards. The latest indignities even include charges for adding money to your account.

There are myriad reasons people choose a prepaid debit card,

but they are all predicated on the hypothetical equation that the cards will save them money over traditional checking accounts with potential overdraft fees. Yet, with these cards, you don’t build a credit history to increase your credit score; you don’t avoid fees; and, you don’t structure your finances so that you spend more wisely.

The only real beneficiaries of these cards are the institutions that issue them, because the fees add up with the same regularity as with bank accounts, and sometimes amount to more charges for the users than there would be with a traditional checking account.

Take the new Mango card, for example. While it gives you a paltry $20 one-time bonus for enrolling in direct deposit — far less than what the issuing bank will save over time — it charges you $2 per ATM withdrawal, $4.95 to deposit cash through a third party (direct deposit is free) and 50 cents for each balance inquiry.

To its credit, the Mango card is linked to your savings account and will reimburse the $5 monthly fee if you add at least $500 a month, which is a virtual wash when you consider the reload fee. And there’s a big catch on the promised 6 percent yield on the savings feature: It’s only for balances less than $5,000 and it’s a teaser rate, so it won’t last long. Have more than $5,000 on deposit? Then the rate is 0.10 percent.

Unlike the new fee-laden Approved Card, which has TV personality Suze Orman as a promoter and investor (link.reuters.com/jex56s),

the Mango card is being endorsed — but not co-branded by — comedian George Lopez. While Lopez may be a funny guy, the card and its fees are no laughing matter if you’re serious about saving money.

Celebrity cards are rarely a good deal. In most cases, you’ll pay more, so instead of running toward celebrities’ financial products, we should be bolting away from them. Which brings to mind Russell Simmons’s pre-paid Rush Card, also marketed under “Baby Phat,” which advertises no “hidden fees.”

The music mogul has promoted the card as a way to empower the black community with access to banking services. While the card doesn’t hide its fees — they are listed in the cardholder agreement (link.reuters.com/sex56s) — they certainly add up and don’t encourage net savings. The company will impose surcharges up to $14.95 just based on the design or logo on the card. You are allowed two free withdrawals per month, but after that the cost is $2.50 per transaction. There’s no charge to add money, but if you need to replace your card or get express cash, it’s $30 for each service. The basic plan costs $9.95 a month.

The obvious drawback to consumers of paying multiple fees for access to their money on these products came to the attention of the Florida Attorney General’s office, which last year was investigating the claims of the Rushcard and other prepaid card companies. Perhaps more state attorneys general should start looking into bank practices on these prepaid cards to see if there is any predatory marketing going on; and work on regulating the message banks are sending. Maybe a consumer campaign on Twitter would be enough to put a stop to them.

Simmons, for his part, responded to the Florida probe by defending his product, saying: “third party research has shown that for many customers, the best prepaid card services offer significant savings compared to what they would pay in traditional bank checking accounts, with savings of up to 50 percent.” (link.reuters.com/kex56s)

If there were no free checking accounts or debit cards available, that might be true. But we recently listed 10 options (link.reuters.com/wep95s), and you can go to a site like bankrate.com (link.reuters.com/mex56s) and find plenty more. Some 76 percent of credit unions (link.reuters.com/nex56s) offer free non-interest bearing checking accounts. You can still get socked with overdraft fees, though, so you have to be careful how you use them. You can also do a detailed calculation comparing bank fees and prepaid debit cards fees at the credit card-comparison site nerdwallet.com (link.reuters.com/pex56s).

Want to stick with banks? Then check out online banks. More than half of them offer free checking accounts with no maintenance fees, according to Moneyrates.com (link.reuters.com/qex56s),

which notes that “free checking is making a comeback.”

If you really want to endorse what a celebrity is doing, just watch their shows or buy their books or music. Stay away from their financial services offerings. They are not only banking on their fame, they are overcharging you to subsidize their celebrity.

(Editing by Beth Pinsker Gladstone and Andrea Evans)

© 2011 REUTERS (www.reuters.com)